Home / Publications / Reflections on Research Processes in the Digital Age


Reflections on Research Processes in the Digital Age


Patrick Haggard, Gretty Mirdal (éd.), Reflections on Research Processes in the Digital Age, Paris, IEA de Paris, 2016


The Paris IAS offers a rare opportunity for advanced researchers to share insights and compare perspectives across disciplines. In our recent discussions, one common theme emerged: the rapid change in the kind of research we do, and the way we do it, due to emerging digital research technologies. Informal discussion with IAS colleagues revealed a wide range of benefits, transformations, but also risks and costs of these digital revolutions in the research process. We decided to collate the commentaries of current IAS fellows from several disciplines, to provide a series of unique and personal snapshots of research in the digital age.
The contrasts between disciplines, and even between individual researchers in the same discipline, are striking. In some fields, digital toolkits have enabled dramatic progress in both quantity and quality of research. In other fields skepticism reigns, and researchers fear that digitally-mediated information overload will discourage traditional thoughtful scholarship. In some fields, the digital age has simply changed the way that people answer the accepted key research questions. In other fields, digital methods have changed the questions that researchers ask. Moreover, digital research methods have themselves become an object of research. The IAS fellows’ comments demonstrate the power but also the diversity of the digital transformation of research processes and research agendas.
We offer these perspectives largely unedited, as examples of the impact of the digital age on the research process. We hope they will stimulate useful self-reflection by scholars and students across all disciplines. They can also offer a useful comparative document for understanding similarities and differences between disciplines in research methods, theories and agendas.

Read more:

Syrian heritage: what to do with ancient objects removed from their context?
01 September 2016 - 30 June 2017
Social Inequalities at Work: A Comparison of France and Britain
01 September 2016 - 31 January 2017
Tropical Medicine as Enlightenment Colonialism: Digital Research and Collaboration
01 October 2016 - 30 June 2017
Decoding Digital Democracy
01 September 2016 - 31 December 2016
An expressivist account of vagueness
01 October 2016 - 30 June 2017
The Poet's Echo: Art Song in Russia, 1730-2000
01 September 2016 - 30 June 2017
Urban sociability and political engagement in 18th-­century Paris
01 October 2016 - 30 June 2017
"Logics of Legitimacy" in the Shangshu, one of the Five Classics of early China
01 September 2016 - 31 January 2017
Bodily building blocks of subjectivity
01 October 2016 - 31 October 2016 / 01 May 2017 - 31 May 2017
Topographies of power. The Episcopal territory at the beginning of the medieval landscapes
01 October 2016 - 31 March 2017
Planting Dance: Natural History and Cultural History of Gender in Performance
01 October 2016 - 30 June 2017
Cosmopolitanism in eighteenth-century Europe: concepts, networks and practices
01 October 2016 - 30 June 2017
Writing Intimacy: Privacy, Mobility, Gender and Rights in the French Empire, 1914-1945
01 October 2016 - 30 June 2017
Mathematics in Administrative and Economic Practices in Ancient Mesopotamia
01 October 2016 - 30 June 2017
The Software Arts
01 September 2015 - 31 December 2015
31 December 2015
Neurobiological knowledge and human nature
01 May 2016 - 31 May 2016
Carlos Gonçalves,Cheikhmous Ali,Duncan Gallie,Felicia McCarren,Isabel Sanchez Ramos,Jennifer Anne Boittin,John MacFarlane,Michael Nylan,Pascal Bastien,Patrick Haggard,Patrick Haggard,Philip R. Bullock,Sean Takats,Simon Macdonald,Warren Sack,Warren Sack
Digital humanities
Contemporary period (1789-…)
World or no region
Patrick Haggard, Gretty Mirdal (éd.)